Wednesday, 22 March 2017

Destructing the poem: Ern Malley goes to Sappho Books

Toby Fitch organised a celebration of Ern Malley's 99th birthday (14 March). There were many there. Sixteen poets, academics, and others read a poem each. The audience was vibrant. Judith Rodriguez was there, and David Malouf, Beate Josephi, Andrew Taylor and lots of others. Readers included, Joanne Burns, aj carruthers, Leif Mahoney (who had been bruiting this idea about for some time), me (Chris Mansell), Kate Middleton, Amanda Stewart, Richard Tipping (who brought the original Angry Penguins edition), John Tranter etc



           




Michele Seminara took this pic  
of this reading mid-action. 
Low light. Far away.


My allocated poem was Night Piece (alternative version). I'd originally been allocated Night Piece so I compared/edited/stripped down the two poems.

First Night Piece:



 And here is the alternative version (also by Ern of course):








































Then I thought I'd see what the differences were and see if that made any sort of sense. I've left in the Track Changes/edit so you can see I did not cheat with this. Nymph was deleted and then inserted because it changed its position.









































I read this - the alternative alternative version.

And then I wondered what the remainder looked like (extracted from the blue above):









































The question then is do any of the versions seem better to a contemporary ear? When you read some of the other poems in the magazine of the time you can see why Max Harris might have leapt at these poems.

If you have no idea what I'm talking about, go to Jacket: http://jacketmagazine.com/17/index.shtml
or more comprehensively Jacket2: https://www.jacket2.org/commentary/ern-malley

Thursday, 10 November 2016

Asemic writing

video 


Once you see you cannot escape seeing; once you're literate you cannot escape writing; once you read you cannot escape meaning.


                                 Words on water, Chris Mansell

Saturday, 8 October 2016

Definition of a quad by Chris Mansell

Here is a quad - a strict form I invented and which has appeared in two collections (Stung, and Stung More) to date.

Here is the first quad in the Stung collection:


What a quad is:

  1. One quad comprises 4 interlinked squares, made up of 15 characters wide x 8 lines deep, exactly. (Obviously the font chosen is fixed width. They were originally composed on a manual typewriter.) 
  2. There is no punctuation, at all, including apostrophes. 
  3. There are no gaps at the ends of lines
  4. There are words within words.
  5. The black/red is not accidental. There must be some red characters on each line. 
  6. The reds form a (subsidiary) poem in itself, particularly as a sound poem. 
  7. The breaks and elisions in words, and the grammatical enjambment are not accidental and contribute to the meaning, imagery, rhythm etc 
  8. Subject matter can be anything: straight imagist as here, though surrealism is good.
  9. There are no titles, except for perhaps numbers.